{"id":241,"date":"2014-12-13T16:29:22","date_gmt":"2014-12-13T16:29:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/windsor2030.org\/?p=241"},"modified":"2014-12-13T18:34:07","modified_gmt":"2014-12-13T18:34:07","slug":"windsor-2030-survey-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/?p=241","title":{"rendered":"Windsor 2030 survey results"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Windsor 2030 survey is now closed.<\/p>\n<p>Please click below for the raw results.\u00a0 Note that these are yet to be analysed for statistical significance, sample bias or correlations so any conclusions drawn should be treated tentatively.<\/p>\n<p>However, at first glance, it does seem that\u00a0\u2018preserving our heritage\u2019,\u00a0\u2018retail mix\u2019 and \u2018attractive architecture\u2019 are emerging as the key priorities for improvement.\u00a0Public parks and outdoor areas and independent brands also scored highly.\u00a0 Collectively these could be described as \u2018ambiance\u2019.\u00a0 It is a good fit with what Windsor 2030 has called \u2018five star Windsor\u2019, validating this objective as well as the \u2018heritage\u2019 objective.<\/p>\n<p>Also emerging as priorities\u00a0are car parking and \u2018making it easier to get here\u2019.\u00a0 The last could be regarded as surprising given that many respondents live here but on the other hand they also clearly suffer the same jams and frustrations with parking.\u00a0 This would also appear to suggest that the proposed transport objective is also in-line with respondents\u2019 wishes.<\/p>\n<p>Less popular for improvement was \u2018top brands\u2019, perhaps reflecting Windsor\u2019s\u00a0attraction as\u00a0a more traditional shopping centre, that people don&#8217;t want it to become just another retail outlet or to try to compete with larger places such as Reading.\u00a0\u00a0Coming last was \u2018shops for people on a budget\u2019.\u00a0 However, it should be noted that even though this is less popular it still didn\u2019t score zero and that the difference between the most popular and least popular options was relatively small, suggesting that people want a balanced approach to the town.<\/p>\n<p>Also worth a read are the free text comments. The unprompted themes emerging include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Improving the riverside area<\/li>\n<li>Better rail services\/supporting WLR (12 comments); against WLR (3 comments)<\/li>\n<li>Parking\/park-n-ride<\/li>\n<li>Quality\/type of shops<\/li>\n<li>Nightlife (abolish or improve)<\/li>\n<li>Cycling<\/li>\n<li>Road and pavement surfaces<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>There seemed a reasonable mix of resident and non-resident responses but a slight bias in the number of male vs female respondents, which may affect the above results when adjusted for.  A good proportion of younger respondents was also achieved.  <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/windsor2030.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Survey-raw-results-summary.pdf\" class=\"tmnf-sc-button  custom\" style=\"background:;border-color:\"><span class=\"tmnf-\">Results summary<\/span><\/a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/windsor2030.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Survey-free-text-responses.pdf\" class=\"tmnf-sc-button  custom\" style=\"background:;border-color:\"><span class=\"tmnf-\">Free text responses<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Windsor 2030 survey is now closed. Please click below for the raw results.\u00a0 Note that these are yet to be analysed for statistical significance, sample bias or correlations so any conclusions drawn should be treated tentatively. However, at first glance, it does seem that\u00a0\u2018preserving our heritage\u2019,\u00a0\u2018retail mix\u2019 and \u2018attractive architecture\u2019 are emerging as the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-2"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/WP_20131208_009.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4A1b1-3T","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=241"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241\/revisions\/248"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/11"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/windsor2030.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}